Defenders of the Faith

I have heard one Theologian say that he is a watchdog of God, and as such he cannot help but bark when his Master is attacked. As wonderful as this sounds, I think this is a terrible Theological statement. We are not called to be 'attackers of the faith', but defenders. We are told by Paul to keep our convictions between ourselves and God; not to go attacking others with our beliefs. Jesus tells us to make sure we do not cast pearls before swine, or they will tear us to pieces. We get a clear picture here of the fact that we are to be a light, an example, and a witness. We are not to shove our conviction in other's faces; for one, even if they did what we asked this does not make them Christians, and two, conviction is the work of the Holy Spirit, not ours to do. One that note, God does not desire dogs, he desires sons and daughters. God can defend Himself quite well if He would need to, and we as His children need to realize we are not to go fighting flesh and blood, but the spirit of darkness.

You may ask,"So are we not supposed to witness to people?" Of course we are! This is the function of a Christian. The very reason for our continued existence here on Earth. However, it is not as simple as just shouting in people's faces. Nor is it trying to guilt trip people into joining a church. Although these things may work from time to time, that does not make them the best alternative. You may be able to kill a fly with a shotgun, but that does not mean you should. In the same way, blasting people with the Gospel may hit one or two, but will most likely cause far more damage than good in the area.

In the end, there is no easy black and white line of evangelism. Instead, it is a day to day existence. If our relationship with the people around us does not show them Christ, we should not think that approaching a stranger will help. Oh, it may ease our conscience, we can say we tried, but that is not really what God requires of us. He requires us to be faithful. This is not a 10:00-12:00 every Sunday in Church type of faithful, but a faithfulness in every corner of our lives. It is a painful faithful, one that requires sacrifice and self-denial. It is one that we work with our entire lives here on Earth. That, my friend, is how we are to evangelize. And if we do, then people will come to us to ask of the hope that is in us. Until that time, we are to be faithful in word and deed. If we cannot be faithful in our own lives, how can God expect us to be so in someone else's?

Absolute Goodness?

Often we as Christians assume that when we are faced with a decision there is one absolute perfect choice. We believe that our choices can be ranked as good, better and best.

But is this true? Can all choices be ranked like this? As easy as this would make life, I do not believe this to be the case. I do not think that there is only one perfect answer in every situation. I believe there to be multiple best answers that are all equally good. Now I am not trying to say that we can assume that whatever we do is right, but we would be wise to realize that there can indeed be more than one perfect answer.

How can I be so bold? Well, lets take a look at God's choices. The first thing to consider is that He indeed mades choices. We see references do God's decision-making throughout the Bible. We know that Jesus often chose things in a manner that may seem arbitrary and random. But chose God does. If God is also perfect and absolutely holy then any decision made must also be both of those things. The fact that He has more than one thing to choose from shows that they meet His criteria, namely, perfection and holiness.

But what if there is only one perfect choice? Well, then God is confined to only making those choices, this means that He would have no Freewill. If that is true, then it follows that God has less choice than you or I, less choice than my cat, and less choice than anything He created. That would also mean the things He created had more power than He. This does not make sense, in fact, it flies in the face of what we understand about God.

So what can we apply from this information? Well, we know that there are multiple best answers. As such, we should be very hesitant in judging people we do not understand. We should be unwilling to assume that people who make different spiritual choices are automatically 'less holy' or 'less spiritual' than we are. It is very important that we do not assume that our understanding of perfection is the only accurate one. Many Christians condemn others assuming that their best must also be another person's best as well. This is not our place. Our preference and ignorance should not be our guide in evaluating other people's Godliness. If we doubt someone else's faith, we should do what we should always do; bring it to God in prayer, and act in love.

Age and Conviction

The older we get the more often we find ourselves looking at those that are younger than ourselves and wonder, "Do they really understand what it means to be a Christian? Do they know what all this entails?" We wonder if they really 'get it' or if they are just following along with the crowd.

Is this fair? I don't know anyone else's heart, nor am I really supposed to. But I can look back on my own life and experiences. When I was a child, I did what many children do and 'asked Jesus into my heart.' Now, I know there is a lot of backlash against that phrase, but as a child, I took this seriously. It was perhaps a more simple experience, and I was far more ignorant of Theology and God than I am know, but it was just as much a true spiritual experience before Him. As I continued to grow older, I had more experiences of this nature. I would grow in understanding and maturity and have a deeper understanding of what Christianity and God entail.

This progression continues to this day. I grow and understand more. But the experience with God that I had as a child was no less real, important, or valid because of my lack of understanding then. In fact, I believe that the inverse is more likely true. As a child, I flung myself completely upon God without a doubt of philosophy, theology, or rhetoric. Although I strive in understanding God and being a better Christian, and I find these things very important; the lack of them as a child did not make for a fake Christianity. Indeed, we find that Jesus told us something of this in Scripture. To whom more is given, more is required. We find that this is still true of us. As children, we are given little complex understanding, therefore little is required of us. The inverse is true in adulthood and as we grow in Christ.

So am I saying we need to stay spiritual infants and never have to worry about our faith being a fraud? Not at all, we are to be obedient servants and stewards, and that requires growing up in Christ.

In the end, what I am saying is that children and new converts may not have much understanding or revelation as a mature Christian. This does not make their Christian faith or walk less valid, nor does it discount them as followers. However, it does discount them as leaders of the faith.